Teams reviewing deliverables · Readiness Record Skip to content

Teams reviewing internal or supplier deliverables

Every deliverable reviewed in full, against the same standard.

From the reviewer who signs off a skim to the one who can show why each deliverable was accepted or sent back.

PMOs and assurance teams reviewing projects' work, and client teams accepting what suppliers submit.

ReviewAre they ready?

Request early access

We talk through your project and whether we're the right fit for you.

See it in action

Deliverables register

Riverside Depot Renewal · 6 decisions

SupplierDeliverableDecisionReasonReviewerDate
Civils contractorDelivery Programme v3AcceptedCommissioning dependencies named, §6.2Assurance lead5 Sep
Civils contractorDependency Register v2Sent backNo owner or required date for D-15Assurance lead5 Sep
Systems integratorCommissioning Plan v1Sent backWitnesses for the integrated tests not identifiedPMO reviewer9 Sep
Design consultantDepot Layout Design Report v4AcceptedEvery evidence requirement metPMO reviewer10 Sep
Civils contractorDependency Register v3AcceptedD-15 owner and date now recordedAssurance lead15 Sep
Rail systems supplierOperations Readiness Plan v2Sent backHandover dates differ from the Delivery ProgrammeAssurance lead16 Sep
Delivery Programme v3Accepted

Commissioning dependencies named, §6.2

Civils contractor · Assurance lead · 5 Sep

Dependency Register v2Sent back

No owner or required date for D-15

Civils contractor · Assurance lead · 5 Sep

Commissioning Plan v1Sent back

Witnesses for the integrated tests not identified

Systems integrator · PMO reviewer · 9 Sep

Depot Layout Design Report v4Accepted

Every evidence requirement met

Design consultant · PMO reviewer · 10 Sep

Dependency Register v3Accepted

D-15 owner and date now recorded

Civils contractor · Assurance lead · 15 Sep

Operations Readiness Plan v2Sent back

Handover dates differ from the Delivery Programme

Rail systems supplier · Assurance lead · 16 Sep
Demonstration data on a fictional programme.

The deadline skim

Deadlines force a skim, not a full review

  • Every reviewer, and every project, judged differently
  • “Reviewed” is on record; “acceptable” is not
  • Hard to show later why it was accepted or sent back

A named reviewer can read any finding in context, then accept, challenge, or query it.

A reviewer choosing to accept, challenge or query a finding, with the cited passage highlighted beside it.

  1. Every finding links to the passage behind it, or says what it could not find.

  2. Their judgement is saved with their name and reasons, and the original finding stays on the record.

Reviewer judgement

Their judgement is saved with their name and reasons, and the original finding stays on the record.

Signed record

A named person can sign the record at any point.

Decisions that stand up to audit or challenge, years later.

Know what is ready, what is missing, and what needs to improve.

Request early access

We talk through your project and whether we're the right fit for you.