Reviewer judgement
A named reviewer can read any finding in context, then accept, challenge, or query it. Their judgement is saved with their name and reasons, and the original finding stays on the record.
Have you noticed that even with extensive tracking, critical gaps can still surface late?
Progress reporting often focuses on whether individual deliverables are on schedule or marked complete. That doesn't tell you whether they meet the standard they'll be judged by, or whether they are consistent with one another.
So, detailed assessment often waits until the work is brought together. Until then, the status can look more confident than the evidence behind it.
By the time missing evidence, contradictions, and unmet requirements become clear, there may be little time left to address them.
With it, you start from the criteria the submission needs to meet, a published standard or your own procedure, expertly tailored for this project.
-
1
Choose the assessment set
A published standard or your own criteria, set up once: what the submission will be judged by.
-
2
Assess evidence
AI tests the document set against every criterion and evidence requirement, citing the passage behind each rating.
-
3
Review findings
A named person accepts or changes each finding. The software proposes; it never decides.
-
4
Generate improvements
AI suggests and drafts improvements to close gaps and strengthen the evidence.
-
5
Reassess and track
Each revision is reassessed automatically. Readiness is tracked over time and forecast to the submission date.
On course for the decision date?
Each time you can see what has improved, what remains unresolved, and whether you're on course to meet the agreed criteria by the decision date. If you're falling behind, it shows where, so you can step in early.
Midlands Metro Phase 2 · Gate 3 review, 2 Nov
{{ rd.runLabel }}{{ rd.status }}
{{ rd.met }}%of criteria met · → {{ rd.fc }}% by 2 Nov · target 75%
Green {{ rd.g }}Amber {{ rd.a }}Red {{ rd.r }}63 criteria
Request early access
We talk through your project and whether we're the right fit for you.
So, how can you check the assessment?
Every finding links to the passage behind it, or says what it could not find.
Signed record
A named person can sign the record at any point.
Who decided what, when, and on what basis.
Your data is safe with us.
It all stays in the UK, and we're Cyber Essentials Plus certified.
-
Certified and registered.
Programme Insights Limited, the company that makes Readiness Record, has been Cyber Essentials Plus certified since 2 July 2026. ICO registered, registration ZC104280.
Check the certificate on the public register → -
Signed in and checked.
Every module route is authenticated through Microsoft Entra ID and checks that the user belongs to the workspace.
-
Only the documents you choose.
Each assessment runs only on the documents in the scope you set.
-
Encrypted and kept apart.
Documents are encrypted in transit and at rest. Each client's documents are kept in that client's workspace.
Who it's for
Prepare · Review
Consultancies
From reviews that depend on who runs them to one method on every engagement, with every rating traced to its evidence.
Read more →PrepareAre we ready?
Teams preparing submissions
From hoping the submission holds up to walking into any review confident, with the best possible submission and a clear understanding of where you stand.
Read more →ReviewAre they ready?
Teams reviewing deliverables
From the reviewer who signs off a skim to the one who can show why each deliverable was accepted or sent back.
Read more →Readiness Record in action · about 2½ min
See it in action
A short walkthrough of the product at work.
Know what is ready, what is missing, and what needs to improve.
Request early access
We talk through your project and whether we're the right fit for you.